CHAPTER
III
RESEARCH
METHOD
A. Type
of the Research
Type of the research the writer uses in this research is Classroom
Action Reasearch (CAR). Rochiati Wiraatmaja stated, “Classroom action research
is how a group of teachers can organize the condition of teaching and learning
process from their own experiences, and try the improvement of idea in their
learning and teaching, and see the real effect of the effort” (Asep Yoni, S.S, et. al.:
2010: 165-165)
B. Subject
of the Research
The subject of this reasearh is the students of Class 8E
of SMP Negeri 1 Wanareja in academic year 2011/2012. There are forty students of
calss 8E.
It consists of twenty boys and twenty girls. All the students of this class
would be the subjects of this research. The students of class 8F are the most
passive among the students of the eighth grade, especially in reading lesson
and in comprehending the text.
C. Place
and Time of Research
This study would be held in Januari 2012 at the second
semester at class 8E of SMP Negeri 1 Wanareja in the academic year 2011/2012.
The writer chooses this school because the writer has been teaching there since
1984, so the writer has been familiar with this school. The table below
discusses about the writer’s activities in doing this research.
Table
3.1
The Activities and Time Allocation of Research
No
|
Activities
|
Months
(2011-2012)
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sept
|
Oct.
|
Nov.
|
Dec.
|
Jan.
|
Feb.
|
MAR
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
||
1
|
Observation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
Making Proposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Making Instrument
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Seminar of Thesis
Proposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Cycle 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Cycle 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Making Report
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Thesis Examination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this research the writer took two cycles, and in each
cycle consists of two action (meeting).
Table 3.2
The
Schedule of the Research
CYCLE 1
|
|||||
Action
|
The month’s Name
|
The days’
Names
|
Date
|
Period
|
Time
|
1
|
January
|
Tuesday
|
10
|
6-7
|
2 x 40’
|
2
|
January
|
Thursday
|
12
|
5-6
|
2 x 40’
|
Table 3.3
The
Schedule of the Research
CYCLE 2
|
|||||
Action
|
The month’s Name
|
The days’
Names
|
Date
|
Period
|
Time
|
1
|
January
|
Tuesday
|
17
|
6-7
|
2 x 40
|
2
|
January
|
Thursday
|
19
|
5-6
|
2 x 40
|
D. Design
of the Research
This research is conducted on the basic of classroom
action research procedure. It is concerned with the improvement of students
through action which would be given.
. Here the writer uses the research design the Spiral
model by Kemmis and McTaggart (1988: 48). The main concept of the action
research of spiral model by Kemmis and McTaggart consists of four components, they are planning,
acting, observing, and reflecting. This four phases are considered one cycle.
After finishing one cycle, it was continued by the second one.
This aim of this research is improving students’
activeness in reading class especially in comprehending the English text using
discussion technique. There are two cycles, and each cycle consists of two meetings.
The action research cycles can be drawn as follows:
Figur 3.1
The
Cycles of the Action Research
1.
Planning
In order to get the optimal result to solve the problems,
the writer tries to make a plan in the cycles based on the problems that are
faced by the students in reading class especially in comprehending the text in
the classroom. Here, the writer exposed the plans for the research as follows:
a.
preparing and selecting the materials
b.
making the lesson plans which woud be taught to the students
using discussion technique, and
designing the steps in doing the action
c.
preparing teaching aids/media
d.
preparing observation instruments that would be brought
into classroom and used to know the situation of teaching and learning process
when the method is applied, and to know whether the students’ activeness in
reading class especially in comprehending the English text using the discussion
technique is improving well or not
2.
Acting
The activity is done based on the planned material,
lesson plan and planned steps. The steps in action: when the problems are found
in Cycle 1, the problem must be solved in Cycle 2. While in teaching and
learning process, the researcher presents to monitor and evaluate the process
and observe whether the teaching learning process is done as it is planned.
Observation is very important to do, because it is done to know the student’s improvement
in learning. Observation is done during the implementation of the action while
the students are doing the activities.
3.
Observing
Meanwhile the writer as a teacher does the actions,
the collaborators observe the process
during the lesson. The writer whenever as a teacher or observer keeps on making
records or notes of process by making field notes. Moreover, the observers/collaborators
are surely having observation checklists on their hands to be filled up during
the process.
4.
Reflecting
It is the last step. All the actions are evaluated and reflected
in the end of each cycle. The writer as a teacher and the collaborators try to
analyze the result of the observation and questionnaire to know the effect of using
discussion technique in reading class especially in comprehending the English text.
In this step, the researcher evaluates the teaching based on the data in
interview, the observation during the class, the questionnaire and field notes.
The reflecting can be in the format of progress or improvement, weakness, etc
during the teaching process. The result of reflection is considered to do in
the next cycle. This research has two cycles, and each cycle consists of two
actions. Having done the reflection, next, the researcher revised the plan that
has been implemented before. The revised planing is used to conduct the action
in the Cycle 2, and the reflection at the Cycle 2 is used to compare the result
of Cycle 1 with the Cycle 2, whether there is students’ activeness improvement
during learning and teaching process or not. If there is no students’
activeness improvement, so the Cycle 2 can be repeated once more.
E. Instrument
of Collecting Data
Instrument is used to collect data in the research. According to Arikunto, S.
(1998: 37), there are many kinds of instruments such as test, questioner,
interview, observation, rating, scale and documentation.
Instrument for collecting data aims to support the
success of the research. It helps the reseacher to get the data and the
information about the process of students’ activeness improvement in reading
class especially in comprehending reading through discussion technique more
early.
In conducting the research, the writer used some instruments
for collecting data. The data of the research would be collected from
observation sheet, interview, questionnaire, and field note or informal note. The
description is as follows:
1.
Observation
The observation used in this reasearch is to see the
process by eyes observation. The writer used observation because he wants to
know the students’ activeness during teaching and learning process, in the reading
lesson especially in comprehending the English text through discussion
technique.
On the observation, the writer provided the observation
lists as the instrument for collecting data. There are two kinds of observation
checklists. Those were provided for observing the students’ activities and also
the teacher’s activities during the teaching reading process using discussion
technique. In this case, the result percentage of the students’ activeness the
writer used is the individual activeness, although the learning process was
done in groups.
2.
Interview
John (1970: 181) states that through interview technique,
the reseacher may stimulate the subject to get
a greater insight into his own experiences and there by exploring
significant areas, not anticipated in the original plan of investigation.
In this study the interview was done to collect data by
asking questions to the collaborators who helped in observation during learning
and teaching process in reading class especially in comprehending the text through
discussion technique. The interview with collaborators was done after doing learning
and teaching process in the Cycle 1 and Cycle 2.
The interview with collaborators was to ask about the
merit and lack of the teacher in teaching reading comprehendsion using
discussion technique. By knowing the lack, the writer as a teacher was able to
make improvement in the next meeting in teaching.
3.
Questionnaire
Suharsimi Arikunto
states in Acep
Yoni, S.S, et.al: 2006: 174).
A questionnaire is a number of written questions which is used to gain
information from respondents about their knowledge, belief, etc.
In this research, the writer as a teacher used the
questionnaire to know the students’ responses by giving questions to the
students related with the English teaching and learning process, especially in
reading class using the discussion technique. It was given at the last of actions
in Cycle 2, and in this case the writer used the closed questionnaire.
The percentage result of the students’ responses the
writer used is the individual responses, although the learning process was done
in groups.
4.
Field Notes
Informal notes were written by the writer. He made field note
described as follows:
a.
The
Students
This part was made to know what the students did before
the lesson and during the teaching learning process.
b.
The
Teacher
It was aimed to make notes what the teacher as the
reseacher did during the teching learning process.
c.
The
Discussion Technique
At this part, the notes were made to know whether the
technique worked or not in the teaching process. It was also made to know the
students’ activeness in reading comprehension through the discussion technique,
by means to know the failure and successes of the technique, the effect of the
technique in the students’ behaviour and development.
d.
The
Class
The general situation in the classroom when the
discussion technique was applied to improve the students’ activeness in reading
comprehension.
F. Technique
of
Analyzing Data
The data of
observation and questionnaire result in this research can be seen from the score
result on the sheet of observation and questionnaire used. The percentage of
score achievement on the sheet of observation and questionnaire is used to
determine the improvement of students’ activeness in learning and teaching
process, particularly in reading class through discussion technique in each cycle.
To calculate the
result of the list or sheet of the students’ activities observation, the
questionnaire, and the observation list of teacher’s
activities, the writer used
the formula as follows:
Information:
P
= the percentage of observation or questionnaire score
n
= the total score in each indicator
N
= the maximal score
G. Criteria
of Action Success
According to Sumarno in Sukidin et.al (2002: 141) in the
evaluation, the criteria have a function as the
standard of comparison to determine the level of the
action success based on the consideration that has been agreed by the teacher
as a reseacher and collaborators who helps the teacher to observe the action.
In this research, the teacher and the collaborators
determined criteria of successful action. The action’s success is
based on observation , questionnaire and interview. If the observation
result shows more than 50 % of the students’ activeness in teaching and learning proccess, the
questionnaire shows more than 50 % of students state “Yes”
toward the learning style and interview result shows
the students give positive response or argument of their feeling in
joining the lesson using discussion technique, this research was regarded
success by the writer and collaborators,
and the action would be
stopped.
No comments:
Post a Comment